El Seguro Social anuncia un aumento en los beneficios de 3.6 por ciento para el 2012

19 de octubre del 2011


La Administración del Seguro Social anunció hoy que los beneficios mensuales de Seguro Social y Seguridad de Ingreso Suplementario (SSI, siglas en inglés) para más de 60 millones de personas aumentarán un 3.6 por ciento en el 2012.


El ajuste de costo de vida (COLA, siglas en inglés) de 3.6 por ciento comenzará con los beneficios que cerca de unos 55 millones de beneficiarios de Seguro Social recibirán en enero del 2012. El aumento de pagos de casi 8 millones de beneficiarios de SSI comenzará el 30 de diciembre del 2011.


Otros cambios que tomarán efecto en enero de cada año se basan en el aumento de los salarios promedio. Basado en ese aumento, la cantidad máxima de ganancias sujeta al impuesto de Seguro Social (ingreso tributable máximo) aumentará a $110,100 de $106,800. De los aproximadamente 161 millones de trabajadores quienes pagarán impuestos en el 2012, cerca de unos 10 millones de ellos pagarán impuestos más altos como resultado del aumento del ingreso tributable máximo.


La información referente a los cambios en la cobertura de Medicare para el 2012, cuando se anuncie, estará disponible en el sitio de Internet http://es.medicare.gov/default.aspx. Para algunos beneficiarios el aumento de Seguro Social puede ser ajustado parcial o completamente por los aumentos en las primas de Medicare.


La Ley del Seguro Social estipula la manera en que se calcula el COLA. Para informarse mejor, visite el sitio de Internet www.segurosocial.gov/ajuste.


A Family Member HomeCare of Hollywood & Boca Raton, Florida is a Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach County Home Health Care Agency Serving Coconut Creek, Cooper City, Coral Springs, Dania, Davie, Deerfield, Ft. Lauderdale, Hallandale, Hillsboro, Hollywood, Lauderdale Lakes, Lauderdale-by-the-Sea, Lauderhill, Lighthouse Point, Margate, Miramar, North Lauderdale, Oakland Park, Parkland, Pembroke Park, Pembroke Pines, Plantation, Pompano, Sea Ranch Lakes, Southwest Ranches, Sunrise, Tamarac, Weston, Wilton Manors, Aventura, Hialeah, North Miami, Miami Lakes, Sunny Isles, Bal Harbour, Surfside, Boynton, Lake Worth & Delray With Comprehensive Home Health Care, In-Home Caregivers, Nursing & Home Health Aides for Seniors, Elderly, Disabled, Dementia & Alzheimer’s Patients. Joint Commission Accredited, Licensed, Bonded, Insured

Hallandale Alzheimer's In-Home Caregiver Agency, A Family Member HomeCare of Hollywood and Boca Raton Notes The Florida Current: State proposes steep cuts to Medicaid coverage for hospital stays, doctor visits

By Christine Jordan Sexton, 10/25/2011

http://www.thefloridacurrent.com/

After being told by the House that its proposed budget reductions were unacceptable, Agency for Health Care Administration staff looked for additional ways to find "savings."

Its latest list of cuts -- given to members of a Medicaid health care advisory panel on Tuesday -- would limit the number of payments the state would make for doctors visits to two per month and would cut nearly in half the number of days Medicaid would pay for inpatient hospitalizations, from 45 days a year to 23.

The state also has proposed limiting Medicaid patients to 12 emergency room visits per year as well as eliminating chiropractic services, adult dental services, adult vision and hearing care, as well as eliminating pediatric and chiropractic services.

In all, AHCA has come up with and additional $62.7 million in general revenue reductions that are matched by another $300 million in other trust fund dollars for a total $363 million reduction in health-care spending.

Florida Hospital Association lobbyist and Medical Care Advisory Committee member Paul Belcher described the cuts to inpatient days and emergency visits as "an additional opportunity for hospitals to provide uncompensated care."

Paring back inpatient days would reduce hospital reimbursements by a total $156 million from general revenue and trust funds, and the cuts to emergency room visits would trim back another $12.2 million from hospitals.

Belcher also asked whether the proposed cut to inpatient hospitalization days would affect Medicaid managed-care plans, whose capitation rates include a component for inpatient care. The sheet of proposed cuts did not show any reductions to Medicaid managed-care plans.

Medicaid Assistant Deputy Secretary for Finance Phil Williams said the cut would have an effect on managed-care plans but that the agency "did not go that extra step" in calculating the proposal on managed-care plans.

Acting Medicaid Director Justin Senior told the group the agency didn't include the cuts in its original proposal to the Legislature but compiled them after being told by Rep. Matt Hudson, R-Naples and chairman of the House Health Care Appropriations Subcommittee, that its initial proposals to eliminate the MEDS-AD program and limit Medically Needy were "nonstarters for the House."


Approved by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. A Family Member HomeCare is a licensed, bonded and insured Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach County Home Health Care Agency Serving Coconut Creek, Cooper City, Coral Springs, Dania, Davie, Deerfield, Ft. Lauderdale, Hallandale, Hillsboro, Hollywood, Lauderdale Lakes, Lauderdale-by-the-Sea, Lauderhill, Lighthouse Point, Margate, Miramar, North Lauderdale, Oakland Park, Parkland, Pembroke Park, Pembroke Pines, Plantation, Pompano, Sea Ranch Lakes, Southwest Ranches, Sunrise, Tamarac, Weston, Wilton Manors, Aventura, Hialeah, North Miami, Miami Lakes, Sunny Isles, Bal Harbour, Surfside, Boynton, Boca Raton, Lake Worth & Delray Beach With Comprehensive Home Health Care Services, In-Home Caregivers, Nursing & Home Health Aides for Seniors, Elderly, Disabled, Dementia & Alzheimer’s Patients.

A Family Member HomeCare of Hollywood and Boca Raton, Florida, Notes Gruesome New York Times Story by John Leland about the Health Care System's Forgotten "Stuck In Bed, At Hospital's Expense"



Artwork:  Kyle T. Webster

The New York Times



September 30, 2011
Stuck in Bed, at Hospital’s Expense
By JOHN LELAND


ON Jan. 4, 2010, Raymond Fok was changing trains on his way to kidney dialysis treatment when he collapsed on the Canal Street subway platform. Emergency medical technicians examined him and took him by ambulance to the nearest hospital, New York Downtown, near the foot of the Brooklyn Bridge. Workers in the emergency room recorded that Mr. Fok’s speech was slurred and that he was lurching from side to side when he walked.

“He was a very typical hemorrhagic stroke,” said Jeffrey Menkes, the hospital’s president. From the emergency room, the hospital admitted Mr. Fok to the intensive-care unit on the third floor, where workers tried to find out more about their patient — not just his medical history, but his insurance or Medicaid status, his address, his Social Security or taxpayer identification number, the location of family members.

Once his condition had stabilized, the hospital moved him to a regular room on the fifth floor, where staff members expected to treat him for 7 to 10 days before discharging him to a sub-acute-care center for rehabilitation, the usual regimen for stroke victims.

Nineteen months later, Mr. Fok, 58, greeted a reporter from his bed in Room 516, eager to have a visitor. In the previous year and a half, perhaps 100 or more patients had come and gone from the room’s other bed, but Mr. Fok had gone nowhere. “Yes, I remember you,” he said. “John, right?”

The price of his treatment: $1.4 million.

And who was paying for it?

“The government,” Mr. Fok guessed, though he was not sure. “The hospital is losing money.”

In a city with a large immigrant population, it is not rare for hospitals to have one or more patients who, for reasons unrelated to their medical condition, do not seem to leave. At Downtown, where a bed costs the hospital more than $2,000 a day, there are currently three long-term patients who no longer need acute care but cannot be discharged because they have nowhere to go. The hospital pays nearly all costs for these patients’ treatment. One man left recently after a stay of more than five years.

They are the forgotten people in the health care system — uninsured, usually undocumented, without resources and stuck in the system’s most expensive course of care. Some are abandoned by or estranged from relatives; some belong in rehabilitation centers, where care is much cheaper, but because of their immigration status they are not enrolled in Medicaid or Medicare, so the places will not take them. For hospitals, some of these patients, like Mr. Fok, come in as medical cases and then quickly become puzzles for detective work.

Mr. Fok released the hospital to discuss his treatment, which involved every department of the staff, from laundry and food services to psychiatric care, social work and community outreach.

“The first two or three months was a hard time,” Mr. Fok said from his hospital bed, the left side of his face still partially frozen from the stroke. He had a tattoo around one arm and two lumps on his bare leg where the dialysis needles removed and then returned his blood three times a week. He has spent 23 years in the United States, but his English remains rudimentary.

In the beginning, he said, “always I thought, how long before I go out? Because when you wake up in the same room every day it’s the same thing, ‘When I can get out?’ It’s always depressing. But day by day, day by day, you don’t need to worry about what will happen, because when you wake up it’s always the same room.”

RAYMOND FOK was born in Madagascar and grew up in Hong Kong, where he became a police officer. In 1988, he brought his wife and two young sons on what he told officials was a vacation in New York, and then never returned. Mr. Fok left some question about his reasons for overstaying the family’s tourist visas, repeating that he had feared Hong Kong’s approaching handover to the Chinese government, though at the time this was nine years away.

In New York he found a job at a vegetable market in Chinatown, earning $5 an hour to feed a family of four — and soon, with the birth of his daughter 18 years ago, five. A friend helped him rent an apartment in a heavily Chinese section of Bensonhurst, Brooklyn, and taught him to navigate the subways. But the friend refused to help him apply for permanent residence, Mr. Fok said.

Eventually he landed a job driving a truck for a Chinese-owned company in New Jersey, at $400 a week, off the books, with no insurance benefits, he said. He had a driver’s license and bought a car to commute.

“Make a life, pay rent, support a family,” he said. His wife worked in a laundry on Delancey Street. His sons went to school and later found jobs in bodegas or bagel shops. It was enough.

But driving was stressful, with no extra pay for overtime, and he lived on fatty foods consumed on the go. When his kidneys failed, an emergency-care provision in Medicaid paid for dialysis treatments, though he was otherwise ineligible for coverage.

For Mr. Menkes at New York Downtown, any day the emergency room door might let in the next Mr. Fok. Under federal law, hospitals are required to treat anyone who comes in, regardless of his or her immigration status or ability to pay. Half of the in-patients at Downtown are Asian immigrants, many of them undocumented, Mr. Menkes said. Forty-five percent of those on the staff speak at least one dialect of Chinese. When Mr. Fok arrived — with no Social Security number, no green card, no insurance, disoriented, no known family or address — the hospital was ready for him.

Downtown Hospital, which has an annual operating budget of $200 million, runs at a slim margin, Mr. Menkes said. Three-quarters of its patients receive either Medicaid or Medicare, which have cut reimbursement rates for doctors, even as expenses have risen. Many private doctors have stopped seeing Medicaid patients, but for the hospital, a private nonprofit institution, this is not an option. The hospital loses money on most babies it delivers, Mr. Menkes said, because reimbursement rates fall below the cost of delivery in New York.

Mr. Fok came in the door a sick man. He had kidney failure, hypertension and a weak heart, in addition to having suffered the stroke. He could not eat because of a swallowing disorder caused by the stroke. His left side was immobilized.

“While he was in I.C.U., he said he wanted to die,” said Norma Robinson, a case manager in the hospital’s continuum of care department, which coordinates a patient’s physical and emotional treatment. “Psych came in. A social worker evaluated him. He said he had a son but didn’t know the son’s name.”

So began a mission by the hospital staff to reconstruct the identity of Raymond Fok, with little cooperation and sometimes active interference from the patient. The family had no land telephone line, and Mr. Fok said he did not know anyone’s cellphone number. The detectives were starting from scratch and could not necessarily trust their prime source.

In the hospital’s favor, Mr. Fok had no one else to talk to. He had very few visitors, and his roommates changed every few days, before he could bond. “We were his visitors,” said Chui-Man Lai, an assistant vice president of patient services, community outreach and provider relations. “That’s why information comes up to the surface bit by bit. Mr. Fok didn’t want to expose his family, because the whole family is undocumented.” (His daughter is actually a United States citizen.)

Gradually, nuggets of information came to light. “He said, ‘I have two sons but I’m not associated with them,’ ” Ms. Robinson said. He said that his wife worked in a laundry but that he did not know the name or number. For nearly a year, according to staff members, Mr. Fok declined to provide any other information about his family. He sometimes refused physical therapy or spoke inappropriately to the therapists, said Sharon Fan, a social worker. Ms. Robinson instructed the nurses to watch out for family members visiting him.

When his health became stable, Mr. Fok no longer needed the acute-level care the hospital provided. The administrators tried to find a less costly home for him.

“No nursing home would take him because he had no Medicaid and no green card,” Ms. Robinson said. Early this year, after more than 12 months of treatment, employees had a brief glimmer of hope. An evening nurse spotted a woman who seemed to be Mr. Fok’s wife visiting the room. But hopes were short-lived. “She said she can’t take care of her husband,” Ms. Lai said. The staff redoubled its surveillance, but never saw her again. “It was just that one time,” Ms. Lai said.

Mr. Fok told the hospital that he lived in a five-story walkup, which made going home all but impossible. He needed regular transportation to dialysis, and even if he had Medicaid, the transportation providers carry patients up or down only two flights of steps, said Emma Turner, an administrative supervisor in the continuum of care department.

In fact, the Foks’ apartment is on the ground floor, just five steps up from street level.

“He didn’t belong here,” Mr. Menkes said. “But what’s the alternative?”

TO a stranger meeting Mr. Fok for the first time, he can seem eager for conversation, candid about his life. One former roommate described him as amiable and talkative. He loved soccer. He hated the hospital food. On an August 2011 morning at the hospital, he described the strained family situation in Bensonhurst.

“My sons hate me,” he said. “They say, ‘Why you bring me here? You don’t have idea. You bring me here; it was a mistake.’ I don’t think it was a mistake. When you come here you see a lot of the world. In Hong Kong you see just a little bit of sky, but here you can see a big sky, a lot of people, different people. It’s the capital of the world, New York. Different people, different cultures. But they don’t like it.”

He added: “I’m not worried about it, because I got to take care of myself, first. And second, when they grow up they will understand. One day they will have families and they will understand, too.”

His sons, who he said are 29 and 22, declined to be interviewed for this article. His daughter deferred to her brothers.

With Mr. Fok unable to work, the others had to pay the $1,200 monthly rent without him. He said his sons paid only the electric bill, so they could run the computer and air-conditioner; for the rest, his wife worked 13 hours a day, seven days a week at $5 an hour. She had little time to visit him in the hospital — and no time to take care of him should the hospital discharge him.

New York’s Department of Social Services allows Medicaid and other welfare benefits to illegal immigrants who can demonstrate that the government does not intend to deport them, or who have an immediate relative who is a citizen and files an application on their behalf. Getting the first kind of documentation can take a year or more, Mr. Menkes said. But for Mr. Fok, the second, quicker, option was also possible. His daughter, who was born in New York, was about to turn 18, and could apply for him to receive benefits as what is known as a person permanently residing under color of law, or Prucol. There was only one problem: no one knew how to reach her.

“We continued to feed him, do his laundry, provide nurses and doctors,” Mr. Menkes said. “But he doesn’t belong in an acute-care hospital.” By early 2011, his bill had risen past $1 million, of which the hospital was receiving reimbursement only for his dialysis treatments, which were less than one-tenth of the total costs.

Finally, in March, there was a breakthrough. Mr. Fok was making progress in physical therapy, and staff members told him he could walk if he had a lightweight device called a hemi cane or hemi walker — basically a cross between a cane and a walker, designed for people with use of only one arm.

“I’m good with faces,” Ms. Robinson said. “I come out of the elevator and I see a girl who looks just like him, carrying a hemi walker. I said, ‘Who are you?’ She said, ‘I’m Mr. Fok’s daughter.’ ”

ON Aug. 17, after one year, seven months and 13 days, Mr. Fok returned to his apartment in Bensonhurst, carrying 21 filled prescriptions and his hemi walker. For the $1.4 million in services that Downtown had provided, total reimbursement to the hospital from Medicaid was $114,000, Mr. Menkes said.

Mr. Fok’s immigration status never kept him from receiving treatment, but it helped make sure that his care would be delivered in the most expensive setting possible and in a place no one wants to spend more time than necessary. He was cut off from his family. On several occasions he showed signs of depression or expressed suicidal thoughts.

If he had been insured or immediately eligible for Medicaid or Medicare, he might have gone to a nursing home after a week or two, where the average daily cost in New York is about $350 — and where he might have had steady companionship. Or he might have received a home health aide in his apartment, which could have cost even less, depending on the required hours.

For hospitals like Downtown that treat many illegal immigrants, the health care plan enacted last year does nothing to solve this liability, Mr. Menkes said. During debates about reform, lawmakers insisted that the plan’s benefits not extend to the nation’s 11 million illegal immigrants.

Lawmakers now are proposing cuts to Medicare and Medicaid to reduce the deficit, which may put even more pressure on hospitals like Downtown. Nor is this likely to change. Few politicians who want to be re-elected will advocate broadening public services to illegal immigrants or increasing the taxpayer cost of health care.

For Mr. Fok and his family, the return home has been difficult. After his discharge, he did not immediately get a home health aide. In a family already stressed financially and with difficult relationships, having a patriarch who needs full-time care has raised the tension levels. No one had time before; how could they now?

In late August, Mr. Fok’s older son called the hospital, irate.

“He said, ‘It’s an unsafe discharge; I’m going to report you to the attorney general,’ ” Ms. Robinson said. “ ‘Take him back.’ I said, ‘No, we’re not going to take him back.’ He said: ‘I work and I take care of the apartment. Take him back. I want to finish college, and I have a year and a half to go.’ ”

On a mid-September afternoon, nearly one month after his discharge, Mr. Fok sat in a wheelchair in the crowded waiting room at Chinatown Dialysis Center, a long ambulette ride from Bensonhurst. His hair and beard were neatly trimmed, and he wore a spotless T-shirt.

He was glad to be home, he said. “Yeah, of course.”

But as the conversation continued, he reversed this statement. He spoke in tired monosyllables and did not make eye contact, as he had in the hospital.

Since he came home, his sons have been angry at him, he said: “Because I give them a hard time now. They got to take care of me.”

He cannot prepare food for himself or walk to the door to open it. He needs help getting to the bathroom. He said he had not walked since leaving the hospital, even with the hemi walker. Asked if he would rather be back in the hospital, he said yes.

“I’d like to go back but cannot,” he said. “What reason to go back?”




Artwork:  Kyle T. Webster



Approved by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, A Family Member HomeCare is a licensed, bonded and insured Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach County Home Health Care Agency Serving Coconut Creek, Cooper City, Coral Springs, Dania, Davie, Deerfield, Ft. Lauderdale, Hallandale, Hillsboro, Hollywood, Lauderdale Lakes, Lauderdale-by-the-Sea, Lauderhill, Lighthouse Point, Margate, Miramar, North Lauderdale, Oakland Park, Parkland, Pembroke Park, Pembroke Pines, Plantation, Pompano, Sea Ranch Lakes, Southwest Ranches, Sunrise, Tamarac, Weston, Wilton Manors, Aventura, Hialeah, North Miami, Miami Lakes, Sunny Isles, Bal Harbour, Surfside, Boynton, Boca Raton, Lake Worth & Delray Beach With Comprehensive Home Health Care Services, In-Home Caregivers, Nursing & Home Health Aides for Seniors, Elderly, Disabled, Dementia & Alzheimer’s Patients.

U.S. Senators Chuck Grassley and Herb Kohl are pressing the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services on missing a deadline for drafting regulations for the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, a new law requiring public disclosure of the financial relationships between physicians and the pharmaceutical, medical device and biologics industries



The U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging issued the following news release on October 3, 2011:

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Herb Kohl (D-Wis.) are pressing the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on missing a deadline for drafting regulations for the Physician Payment Sunshine Act (Sunshine Act), a new law requiring public disclosure of the financial relationships between physicians and the pharmaceutical, medical device and biologics industries.

“Prompt federal guidance is urgently needed to ensure a smooth path toward increasing disclosure, eliminating conflicts and ultimately providing patients with the tools they need to make informed health choices,” Grassley and Kohl wrote in a letter to CMS Administrator Dr. Donald Berwick.

The Sunshine Act requires manufacturers to report all payments to physicians, including consulting fees, honoraria, travel and entertainment, and for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to publicly disclose the identity of the manufacturer, physician, and the drug or device associated with the payment on the internet. Additionally, the law requires manufacturers and group purchasing organizations (GPOs) to report all ownership or investment interests held by physicians or members of their family, and for making that information public. The law required HHS to establish guidance on how manufacturers submit information and how the information would be made available to the public no later than October 1, 2011.

The Sunshine Act was developed by Grassley and Kohl after numerous investigations and hearings revealed that large sums of money were going to physicians for sometimes questionable purposes. Some of these payments were the subject of a federal criminal inquiry which resulted in $400 million in fines and legal costs paid by the major orthopedic medical device manufacturers. Ultimately, Congress passed the Sunshine Act as part of the health care reform law in response to growing concerns over industry payments to physicians and their potential negative effects on patient care and the need to restrain health care costs.

In their letter, Grassley and Kohl also asked why CMS failed to meet the statutory deadline and requested a timeline on establishing regulations.

Manufacturers and GPOs are required to start complying with the law by collecting payment data beginning January 1, 2012, and must begin reporting this information to the government on March 31, 2013. Starting September 30, 2013, the details of these payments must be made available to the public. Violations of the disclosure requirements can result in civil monetary penalties ranging from $1,000 to $100,000.

The text of the letter follows.

October 3, 2011

Donald Berwick, M.D., M.P.P
Administrator
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201


Dear Administrator Berwick:

As authors and sponsors of the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (Sunshine Act), which was included in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, we write today to express our severe disappointment in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for failing to meet the October 1, 2011, deadline to draft the regulations mandated by the health care reform law.

While many interactions between the pharmaceutical and medical device industries and medical professionals are beneficial to medical science and lead to innovation, the Sunshine Act was developed after numerous investigations and hearings revealed that large sums of money were going to physicians for sometimes questionable purposes. Some of these payments were the subject of a federal criminal inquiry which resulted in $400 million in fines and legal costs paid by the major orthopedic medical device manufacturers. Ultimately, Congress passed the Sunshine Act in response to growing concerns over industry payments to physicians and their potential negative effects on patient care and efforts to restrain healthcare costs.

Under the provisions of this law, manufacturers are required to report to the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) all payments to physicians, including consulting fees, honoraria, travel, and entertainment, for public disclosure by the Secretary. The Secretary is then instructed to include the identity of the manufacturer, the physician, and the drug or device associated with the payment on the internet. An additional provision requires manufacturers and group purchasing organizations (GPOs) to report all ownership or investment interests held by physicians or members of their family, also for public reporting by the Secretary. It is our understanding that the Secretary has delegated implementation of this provision to CMS.

Manufacturers and GPOs are required to start complying with the law by collecting data beginning January 1, 2012, and must begin reporting this information to the government on March 31, 2013. Beginning on September 30, 2013, the details of these payments are to be made available to the public. Violations of the disclosure requirements can result in civil monetary penalties ranging from $1,000 to $100,000.

In order to ensure that manufacturers had adequate time to comply, the law required that the Secretary establish procedures not later than October 1, 2011, describing how manufactures are to submit information and how the information will be made available to the public. In addition, in establishing these procedures the Secretary was required to “consult with the Inspector General, affected industry, consumers, consumer advocates and other interested parties to ensure that the information made available to the public is presented in the appropriate context.”

The deadline for establishing procedures has passed and there has not been, to our knowledge, adequate consultation with either industry representatives or consumer advocates. Therefore, we are concerned that CMS’s failure to implement the statutory provisions on time with clear guidance, standards and definitions will create confusion among both manufacturers and consumers, potentially placing taxpayer dollars at risk.

Although many of the large pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers, universities, and even the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have already begun to implement disclosure policies voluntarily, we are concerned that smaller companies are waiting for clarity and direction from CMS and will find the lack of timely guidance burdensome and costly. Prompt federal guidance is urgently needed to ensure a smooth path toward increasing disclosure, eliminating conflicts, and ultimately providing patients with the tools they need to make informed health choices.

In a conference call with our staff on Friday, September 23, 2011, your agency assured us that you have sent the proposed rule over to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. So that we may better monitor this progress, please answer the following questions in writing no later than October 14, 2011:

  • What is your timetable for implementing the Sunshine Act?
  • When did you originally send the proposed rule to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)? Please include any dates that follow-up was conducted and for what reason.
  • Why have you failed to meet the statutory deadline?
  • What is the anticipated release date of the preliminary regulations? How long will the regulations be open for comment as required by the statute?
  • What is your timeline for issuing final regulations?
In addition to your written response, please have the appropriate CMS officials contact our staff no later than October 7 to schedule an in-depth briefing on these issues and an open discussion on a path forward that allows both a timely implementation and a robust comment period.

Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Erika Smith of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff at (202) 224-5225 or Jack Mitchell of the Senate Special Committee on Aging staff at (202) 224-5364.

Thank you for your immediate attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,


Charles E. Grassley Ranking Member
Committee on the Judiciary

Herb Kohl
Chairman, Special Committee on Aging




For more information about a
Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach County home health care agency for seniors and other family members, contact Brian Gauthier at A Family Member HomeCare (954) 986-5090 or www.afamilymemberhomecare.com. Serving Coconut Creek Cooper City Coral Springs Dania Beach Davie Deerfield Beach Fort Lauderdale Hallandale Beach, Hillsboro Beach Hollywood Lauderdale Lakes Lauderdale-by-the-Sea Lauderhill Lazy Lake Lighthouse Point Margate Miramar North Lauderdale Oakland Park Parkland Pembroke Park Pembroke Pines Plantation Pompano Beach Sea Ranch Lakes Southwest Ranches Sunrise Tamarac Weston Wilton Manors Aventura Sunny Isles Beach Hialeah Miami Lakes Boca Raton Delray Beach.

Hollywood, Florida HomeCare Provider Agrees, "Elderly patients in the Medicare system should not be used as pawns to increase a company's profits" U.S. Senate Finance Committee finds home healthcare companies Amedisys, Gentiva Health and LHC Group at fault for Phony Medicare Billing


By Kavyanjali Kaushik
Reuters
October 3, 2011


(Reuters) - The Senate Finance Committee said Amedisys, Gentiva Health and LHC Group, three of the biggest players in the home healthcare industry, altered the course of patient care treatment to receive more reimbursements.

However, analysts suggested the conclusion of the investigation should help the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) better frame the final structure of reimbursement for home healthcare providers, which provide home-based nursing for the elderly with chronic diseases.

Last year, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Justice Department, and the Senate committee launched investigations into home healthcare billing practices, prompted by a media report that suggested providers intentionally increased therapy visits to trigger higher reimbursements.

"Therapy visit records for each company showed concentrated numbers of therapy visits at or just above the point at which a "bonus" payment was triggered in the prospective payment system," the committee said in its report.

The committee said it found internal documents and emails from the companies' management urging their therapists to increase patient visits to raise Medicare reimbursements after the proposed 2008 cut in payments.

"We took a financial hit for any therapy provided below 10 visits in the past," LHC Group chief executive Keith Myers wrote to a company manager in one of the emails, according to the report.

"Once you get to 6 visits, the more therapy visits provided the better, up to 20 visits," the report quoted from the email.

The report also quoted emails from the managements of Amedisys and Gentiva that exerted similar pressure on their employees to raise the number of therapy visits.

However, the committee noted that Almost Family Inc , another big industry player under scrutiny, did not push its therapists to raise the visit threshold, though it appeared to push for an increase in the number of patients receiving higher level of treatments.

Shares of Almost Family were down 7 percent at $15.51 on Nasdaq on Monday.

"We are disappointed with the committee's conclusions, and we stand by our company's integrity, ethics, and patient care practices," Amedisys said in a statement issued in response to the committee's report.

In a statement, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus said "the gaming of Medicare represents serious abuse of the home health program. Elderly patients in the Medicare system should not be used as pawns to increase a company's profits."

Stephens Inc analyst Ellen Spivey said none of this means the companies have committed fraud.

"This report does not accuse the companies of fraud but rather it is interesting to see that two leaders of the committee specifically termed it "gaming the system," which is often code for we don't like what you did but technically it isn't illegal," Spivey said.


CLEARER PATH FORWARD

Spivey added that since this was the first update on the investigations that were launched a year and half ago, it could give some clarity to the investors who have been worried with all the uncertainties.

Shares of these top home health providers have dropped by 20-30 percent in the last six months, dragged down by the increased scrutiny and uncertainty about the reimbursement cuts.

"From an investor standpoint, it is the uncertainties that are really killing them right now," RBC Capital Markets analyst Frank Morgan said.

"I think getting these investigations out of the way or getting their conclusions out on the table can expedite the process of accessing all the changes that need to be made."

"What needs to happen now is that when CMS creates a perfect reimbursements system, these providers should operate in it," Morgan said.

CMS has proposed a 3.35 percent cut in its 2012 reimbursement rate to home health companies.


Online:  http://www.chicagotribune.com/health/sns-rt-us-home-healthcaretre792682-20111003,0,2937525.story


http://www.chicagotribune.com/health/sns-rt-us-home-healthcaretre792682-20111003,0,2937525.story


Below:  Read the U.S. Senate Finance Committee testimony in the September 21, 2011 hearing, entitled "Dually-Eligible Beneficiaries: Improving Care While Lowering Costs."  (with video)

Max Baucus
(D-MT)
Orrin G. Hatch
(R-UT)

Witness Testimony

Ms. Melanie Bella, Director, Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC
The Senate news release is reprinted below:


Baucus, Grassley Uncover Gaming of the Medicare System by For-Profit Home Health Companies


Finance Senators Release Report Showing Companies Intentionally Increased Frequency of Home Health Visits to Manipulate Reimbursement Rates
Washington, DC – Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and senior Finance Committee Member Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) today released a Finance Committee staff report showing tactics used by major for-profit home health companies to game Medicare. The result has been waste of taxpayer dollars and the delivery of what could be medically-unnecessary patient care to increase the companies’ profits. Baucus and Grassley initiated the investigation into the improper practices as part of the Committee’s oversight role of the Medicare and Medicaid programs and the Senators’ ongoing commitment to protect patients and taxpayer dollars from waste, fraud and abuse.

“The gaming of Medicare represents serious abuse of the home health program,” said Baucus. “Elderly patients in the Medicare system should not be used as pawns to increase a company’s profits. Especially in these tough economic times, taxpayers simply cannot afford for their dollars to be wasted on unnecessary care. We are going to continue to crack down on these companies to ensure taxpayer dollars are used efficiently and Medicare patients are protected.”



“The reimbursement policy encourages gaming, and gaming is what’s occurred. Companies are doing everything they can to make as much money as possible, whether the patients need the care or not. The federal government needs to fix the policy that lets Medicare money flow down the drain. This can’t wait until tomorrow. It should have been done yesterday. The longer this kind of policy continues, the more Medicare’s budget balloons, and the bigger the burden on taxpayers,” Grassley said.

In May 2010, Baucus and Grassley began their investigation into home health therapy practices at Amedisys, LHC Group, Gentiva, and Almost Family in response to a media report that these home health companies took advantage of the Medicare therapy payment system by providing medically-unnecessary patient care.

The Committee staff report released today examines documents provided by the companies which show how therapists were encouraged to target the most profitable number of therapy visits, even when patient need may not have required such visits. In addition, therapy visit records for each company showed concentrated numbers of therapy visits at or just above the point at which a “bonus” payment was triggered by the Medicare program.

Internal documents from three of the four companies, Amedisys, LHC Group and Gentiva, provided evidence of top-down strategies to game Medicare. Highlights from the report include:

Managers encouraged therapists to meet a 10-visit target that would have increased their payments from Medicare.
investigation found that the drug company Sanofi interfered in the approval of generic alternatives to its blood-thinner drug Lovenox, the Finance leaders called on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to help guarantee consumers have access to affordable generic medications. Last December, Baucus and Grassley released a report detailing the relationship between Abbott labs and a Maryland doctor who allegedly implanted nearly 600 unnecessary cardiac stents into his patients, costing the federal government as much as $3.8 million in overpayments. The specific stent case highlighted in the Senators’ report is indicative of a widespread, national problem of unnecessary stenting.

The Senators also spearheaded a two-year inquiry which
revealed undisclosed side effects of the diabetes drug Avandia. This resulted in the FDA restricting use of the drug, ensuring that patients and doctors have the information they need to make safe, informed decisions about their medication.

The Committee’s full report is available by clicking
here.



For more information about a
Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach County home health care and homecare agency for seniors, Alzheimer's patients, sufferers of dementia and other family members needing home health care services or in-home health aides, contact Brian Gauthier at A Family Member HomeCare (954) 986-5090 or visit www.afamilymemberhomecare.com.
  • An “A-Team” tasked with developing programs to target the most profitable Medicare therapy treatment patterns.
  • Therapists and regional managers that were pressured to follow new clinical guidelines developed to maximize Medicare reimbursements.
  • Top managers instructed employees to increase the number of therapy visits provided in order to increase case mix and revenue.
  • A competitive ranking system for management aimed at driving therapy visit patterns toward profitable levels.
  • Evidence that management discussed increasing therapy visits and expanding specialty programs to increase revenue.
The Medicare Part A program pays out an estimated $19 billion yearly for home health care. Fraud, waste and abuse in the health care system cost Americans an estimated $60 billion a year, approximately three percent of total health care spending.
Baucus and Grassley have led numerous major investigations of the health care industry to protect consumers and taxpayer dollars. Earlier this year, when their

A Family Member HomeCare, a Hollywood, Florida Home Health Provider, Notes Florida Current Report: State regulators predict hospice growth if state relaxes health care rules on Certificate of Need (CON)


Above:  Rep. John Wood (R-Winter Haven) Photo Credit: Meredith Geddings

www.TheFloridaCurrent.com

Published October 4, 2011

If Florida eliminates its "certificate of need" program (CON) for health care facilities the number of hospices built in the state would increase.

That's what Jeff Gregg, who oversees the state's CON program in the Agency for Health Care Administration, told the House Health and Human Services Quality Subcommittee on Tuesday as he gave members a primer on the regulatory program that limits the number of hospitals, nursing homes and hospices that can be built in the state without prior approval from Florida health care planners.

Florida law requires a CON for new hospitals, nursing homes, hospices and intermediate care facilities for the developmentally disabled, commonly called ICFDDs. Even though nursing homes are subject to CONs the Legislature put a moratorium on any new nursing home beds in 2001.

Gregg told the committee that there are fewer than five employees in the CON program and that from the agency's perspective the program "is kind of obscure."

That is not the case for the industries affected by it, though, said Gregg who noted that hospitals, nursing homes and hospice programs "tend to cling quite tightly to it."

Gregg said eliminating CONs could increase the number of hospitals or nursing homes but that capital constraints and staffing requirements could be obstacles even if CON was eliminated.

But Gregg warned that hospice programs do not require as much capital investment as the larger facilities and that the care provided isn't as intense.

Without those market barriers hospices could abound, similar to what occurred with home health agencies when the state eliminated CON requirements for them, Gregg said.

Subcommittee chairman Rep. John Wood, R-Haines City, said he wanted committee members to understand the CON program and how it will play in Florida's evolving managed care market place. He said the presentation from AHCA does not mean that there will be a "specific legislative agenda" that will be brought forward during the upcoming legislative session.

But at least one member of the committee expressed sentiment that CONs may not be required for nursing homes and hospitals

"It just seems to me like we can make the free market work," said Rep. Matt Hudson, R-Naples, who said he can see the need for keeping CON requirements for hospice but not for institutional facilities. "Who is going to make that capital investment with an uncertain market place?"




Brian Gauthier's A Family Member HomeCare, a Hollywood, Florida and Boca Raton Home Health Care Agency, provides Home Health Care, Home Health Care Agency, Homecare, In-Home Caregiver, Home Nursing Care, Skilled Nursing, Certified Nursing Assistant, Home Health Aides, Home Health Aide, Senior Companion, Hollywood Home Health Care, Ft. Lauderdale Home Health Care, Miramar Home Health Care, Pembroke Pines Home Health Care, Hallandale Beach Home Health Care, Dania Beach Home Health Care, Cooper City Home Health Care, Fort Lauderdale Home Health Care Agency, Plantation Home Health Care, Weston Home Health Care, Bonaventure Home Health Care, Galt Ocean Mile Home Health Care, Imperial Point Home Health Care, Sunrise Home Health Care, Margate Home Health Care, Lauderhill Home Health Care, Lauderdale Lakes Home Health Care, Medicare Home Health Care, Medicare Home Health Care Agency, Dementia Care Services, Alzheimer's Home Health Care, Coconut Creek Home Health Care, West Park Home Health Care, Coral Springs Home Health Care, Parkland Home Health Care, Deerfield Beach Home Health Care, Pompano Beach Home Health Care, Hillsboro Beach Home Health Care, Lighthouse Point Home Health Care,King's Point Home Health Care, John Knox Village Home Health Care, Palm Aire Home Health Care, Lauderdale by the Sea Home Health Care, Oakland Park Home Health Care, Southwest Ranches Home Health Care, Sea Ranch Lakes Home Health Care, Aventura Home Health Care, Sunny Isles Beach Home Health Care, Surfside Home Health Care, Bahia Mar Home Health Care, Florida Home Health Care, Delray Beach Home Health Care Agency, Boca Raton Home Health

For the sixth time, Florida Asks Feds for Another Medicaid Waiver Extension, A Family Member HomeCare of Hollywood, Florida Notes The Florida Current Report

The Florida Current continues to closely track the Florida Medicaid overhaul saga . . .
State seeks another extension for its Medicaid program


Brian Gauthier's A Family Member Homecare of Hollywood and Boca Raton, Florida provides home Health, Home Health Care, Home Health Care Agency, Homecare, In-Home Caregiver, Home Nursing Care, Skilled Nursing, Certified Nursing Assistant, Home Health Aides, Home Health Aide, Senior Companion, Hollywood Home Health Care, Ft. Lauderdale Home Health Care, Miramar Home Health Care, Pembroke Pines Home Health Care, Hallandale Beach Home Health Care, Dania Beach Home Health Care, Cooper City Home Health Care, Fort Lauderdale Home Health Care Agency, Plantation Home Health Care, Weston Home Health Care, Bonaventure Home Health Care, Galt Ocean Mile Home Health Care, Imperial Point Home Health Care, Sunrise Home Health Care, Margate Home Health Care, Lauderhill Home Health Care, Lauderdale Lakes Home Health Care, Medicare Home Health Care, Medicare Home Health Care Agency, Dementia Care Services, Alzheimer's Home Health Care, Coconut Creek Home Health Care, West Park Home Health Care, Coral Springs Home Health Care, Parkland Home Health Care, Deerfield Beach Home Health Care, Pompano Beach Home Health Care, Hillsboro Beach Home Health Care, Lighthouse Point Home Health Care,King's Point Home Health Care, John Knox Village Home Health Care, Palm Aire Home Health Care, Lauderdale by the Sea Home Health Care, Oakland Park Home Health Care, Southwest Ranches Home Health Care, Sea Ranch Lakes Home Health Care, Aventura Home Health Care, Sunny Isles Beach Home Health Care, Surfside Home Health Care, Bahia Mar Home Health Care, Florida Home Health Care, Delray Beach Home Health Care Agency, Boca Raton Home Health

Weston Home Health Care Agency, A Family Member HomeCare of Hollywood, Florida, Notes AARP 2011 Report on the Cost and Contributions of Family Caregiving



Valuing the Invaluable: 2011 Update - The Growing Contributions and Costs of Family Caregiving
by: Lynn Feinberg, Susan C. Reinhard, Ari Houser, and Rita Choula - AARP Public Policy Institute | from: Public Policy Institute | July 2011


See also: Full report PDF.




Family support is critical to remaining in one’s home and in the community, but often comes at substantial
costs to caregivers themselves, to their families, and to society. If family caregivers were no longer available, the economic cost to the U.S. health care and long-term services and supports (LTSS) systems would increase astronomically.

This Insight on the Issues, part of the Valuing the Invaluable series on the economic value of family caregiving, updates national and individual state estimates of the economic value of family caregiving using the most current available data. In 2009, about 42.1 million family caregivers in the U.S. provided care to an adult with limitations in daily activities at any given point in time, and about 61.6 million provided care at some time during the year.

The estimated economic value of their unpaid contributions was approximately $450 billion in 2009, up from an estimated $375 billion in 2007. The report also explains the contributions of family caregivers, details the costs and consequences of providing family care, and provides policy recommendations to better support caregiving families.

Related Reports
Fact Sheet: Valuing the Invaluable: 2011 Update, The Economic Value of Family Caregiving in 2009
Valuing the Invaluable: The Economic Value of Family Caregiving, 2008 Update
Valuing the Invaluable: The Economic Value of Family Caregiving, 2008 Update Detailed Methodology, Data Year 2008
Issue Brief - Valuing the Invaluable: A New Look at the Economic Value of Family Caregiving, 2006
In Brief - Valuing the Invaluable: A New Look at the Economic Value of Family Caregiving, 2006
Data Digest – State Estimates, 2006
Valuing the Invaluable: Caregivers and the Economic Value of Caregiving, by State, 2006 (single page)




Brian Gauthier's South Florida Home Health Care A Family Member Home Care of South Florida assists Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach County seniors and families with Personal Home Health Care Transferring Walking Dressing Bathing Grooming Companionship Housekeeping Laundry Transportation Meal Preparation Stimulating Activities in-home health care. Serving Miami-Dade Broward Palm Beach Independent Assisted Living clients Memorial Regional Hospital Broward County Coconut Creek Cooper City Coral Springs Dania Beach Davie Deerfield Beach Fort Lauderdale Hallandale Beach, Hillsboro Beach Hollywood Lauderdale Lakes Lauderdale-by-the-Sea Lauderhill Lazy Lake Lighthouse Point Margate Miramar North Lauderdale Oakland Park Parkland Pembroke Park Pembroke Pines Plantation Pompano Beach Sea Ranch Lakes Southwest Ranches Sunrise Tamarac Weston Wilton Manors Medicare Medicaid Federal Health Care North Broward Hospital District South Broward Hospital District silver sneakers Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Aetna Aventura Bal Harbour Bay Harbor Islands Biscayne Park Coral Gables El Portal Florida City Golden Beach Hialeah Hialeah Gardens Homestead Indian Creek Islandia Key Biscayne Medley Miami Miami Beach Miami Lakes Miami Shores Village Miami Springs North Bay Village North Miami North Miami Beach Opa-locka Pinecrest South Miami Sunny Isles Beach Surfside Sweetwater Virginia Gardens West Miami Atlantis Boca Raton Boynton Beach Briny Breezes Delray Beach Greenacres Highland Beach Hypoluxo Juno Beach Jupiter Lake Clarke Shores Lake Worth Lantana Manalapan Mangonia Park North Palm Beach Ocean Ridge Palm Beach Palm Beach Gardens Palm Beach Shores Palm Springs South Palm Beach West Palm Beach, home health care services in home health care senior home health care home health care providers health care agency home health care jobs at home health care home health care agencies in florida home health care florida medicare home health care health care agencies home health care elderly home health care service home care agencies home health care companies home health care agency florida private what is home health care home health care agencies in broward county home health services home health care cost accessible home health care florida home health care home health aide agencies in home health care services home health care business home health care nursing home health care provider home health care home health aides home health care medicare in-home health care agencies home health care seniors provide attendants, caregivers, certified nursing assistants, CNA, companions, HHAs, Society of Certified Senior Advisors, National Association for HomeCare and Hospice; Home Care Association of Florida; American College of HealthCare Executives, Volunteer Broward, Hospice by the Sea, Rotary Club of Fort Lauderdale, Joseph Meyerhoff Senior Center, HomeHealthCompare, home health advance beneficiary notice, Florida Agency for Health Care Administration

A Family Member HomeCare, a Ft. Lauderdale Home Health Caregiver Agency, Notes Florida's Alzheimer's Disease Advisory Committee Meets October 21, 2011 in Tallahassee


The Florida Alzheimer's Disease Advisory Committee next meets October 21, 2011 from 1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. (EST).   Hyperlink to online:  Notice of Meeting

Place:  Cabot Lodge, 1653 Raymond Diehl Road, Tallahassee, Florida  32308

The Alzheimer’s Disease Advisory Committee is a 10-member panel that advises the Florida Department of Elder Affairs regarding legislative, programmatic and administrative matters that are related to Alzheimer’s disease victims and their caretakers. Committee members must be Florida residents and reflect the following representation:
◦At least four of the 10 members must be licensed pursuant to Chapter 458 or 459 or hold a Ph.D. degree and be currently involved in research of Alzheimer’s disease;
◦The 10 members must include a least four persons who have been caregivers of victims of Alzheimer’s disease;
◦Whenever possible, there should be one individual from each of the following professions: a gerontologist, a geriatric psychiatrist, a geriatrician, a neurologist, a social worker and a registered nurse.
Members are appointed to four-year staggered terms. The committee elects one of its members to serve as chair for a one-year term. Committee meetings are held quarterly or as frequently as needed.

Committee Members as of April 2011
Jamie Glavich - Chairperson
9664 Hood Road
Jacksonville, FL 32223
Phone: 904-292-9600
Fax: 904-292-0956

Todd Golde
1275 Center Drive, #BMS J-485
Gainsville, FL 32610
Phone: 352-273-9456
Fax: 352-294-5060


Jaroslaw Koberda, M.D., Ph.D.
1818 Miccosukee Commons Dr.
Tallahassee, FL 32308
Phone: 850-459-8263
Fax: 850-877-3086


Karl Dhana, M.D.
4847 Fred Gladstone Drive
West Palm Beach, FL 33417
Phone: 561-687-5768
Fax: 561-687-0885


Huntington Potter, Ph.D.
4001 East Fletcher Avenue
Tampa, FL 33613
Phone: 813-866-1600
Fax: 813-866-1601
 

Martha Purdy, MSW, LCSW
1506 Lake Highland Drive
Orlando, FL 32803
Phone: 407-843-1910
Fax: 407-381-4155

Christine Powers
12417 Clock Tower Parkway
Hudson, FL 34667
Phone: 727-863-6868
Fax: 727-869-7057


Bruce Robinson, M.D.
5880 Rand Blvd., #205
Sarasota, FL 34238
Phone: 941-917-7197
Fax: 941-917-4016


Peggy Connelly
3205 Astor Avenue
Vero Beach, FL 32966
Phone: 727-644-6314


Frank Webbe, Ph.D.
150 W. University Boulevard,
Melbourne, FL 32901,
Phone: 321-674-8086
 

Role of the Alzheimer's Disease Advisory Committee:

Pursuant to Section 430.501 (3) Florida Statutes, the Governor of the State of Florida also appoints a ten member Alzheimer's Disease Advisory Committee to advise the Department of Elder Affairs.

(a) The committee membership shall be representative as follows:
1. At least 4 of the 10 members must be licensed pursuant to chapter 458 or chapter 459 or hold a Ph.D. degree and be currently involved in the research of Alzheimer's disease.
2.The 10 members must include at least 4 persons who have been caregivers of victims of Alzheimer's disease.
3.Whenever possible, the 10 members shall include 1 each of the following professionals: a gerontologist, a geriatric psychiatrist, a geriatrician, a neurologist, a social worker, and a registered nurse.
Function of the Committee
(b) The function of the Advisory Committee is to advise DOEA in the performance of its duties under the ADI. As appropriate, and with the approval of DOEA, the Advisory Committee may establish subcommittees.
 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florida Administrative Code

CHAPTER 58D-1


ADMINISTRATION OF THE ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE INITIATIVE

58D-1.001 Purpose
58D-1.002 Definitions
58D-1.003 Eligibility
58D-1.004 Program Components
58D-1.005 Program Administration
58D-1.006 Service Provider Responsibilities
58D-1.007 Program Forms
58D-1.001 Purpose.

The purpose of these rules is to provide a framework by which the Department of Elder Affairs will administer Sections 430.501 through 430.504, F.S., the Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative. The Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative (ADI) was established by the Legislature in 1985 to provide services and training to address the special needs of individuals suffering from Alzheimer’s disease and related memory disorders and their caregivers. It also provides for research relating to the cause, prevention, management, and treatment of the disease.

Specific Authority 430.08 FS. Law Implemented 430.04, 430.501, 430.502, 430.503, 430.504 FS. History–New 3-28-95, Amended 9-24-08.



58D-1.002 Definitions.

The following terms are defined in this rule:

(1) Alzheimer’s Disease Advisory Committee: The committee created pursuant to Section 430.501(2), (3), F.S., to advise the department in the performance of its duties pursuant to the ADI.

(2) Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders (ADRD) Research Brain Bank: The entity designated by the department to collect post mortem normal control brains and brains of individuals who were clinically diagnosed as having Alzheimer’s disease for the purpose of conducting comparative research aimed at learning about, finding a cause, and developing a treatment or cure for the disease.

(3) Client: The person with ADRD; however, the client’s caregiver will receive benefits through the provision of education, training, respite, and support services, as needed.

(4) Memory Disorder Clinic: Research oriented programs created pursuant to Sections 430.502(1) and (2), F.S., to provide diagnostic and referral services, conduct basic and service-related multidisciplinary research, and develop training materials and educational opportunities for lay and professional caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. Memory disorder clinics shall provide:

(a) A minimum of four (4) hours of in-service training annually to model day care and respite care providers in the designated service area; and

(b) A minimum of one (1) annual contact with each model day care and respite care provider in the designated service area to plan and develop service-related research projects.

(5) Model Day Care Program: Refers to the three specialized day care programs specifically authorized by Section 430.502(4), F.S. These programs provide a therapeutic setting for the provision of specialized services to clients with Alzheimer’s disease. They also provide training to health care and social service personnel and caregivers, and serve as a natural laboratory for research.

(6) Related Memory Disorders: Other forms of progressive cognitive disorders that result in diminished memory, language, other cognitive functions, and the inability to perform activities of daily living.

(7) Research: Investigations undertaken to determine the cause, resulting behavioral changes, treatment, cure, and impact of ADRD.

(8) Training: The provision of educational activities and instruction to assist health care professionals, social service providers, and caregivers in understanding ADRD and to increase their knowledge and caregiving skills.

Specific Authority 430.08 FS. Law Implemented 430.501-.502 FS. History–New 3-28-95, Amended 9-24-08.



58D-1.003 Eligibility.

(1) To be eligible for model day care services, an individual must be at least 18 years of age and have a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease or a related memory disorder.

(2) To be eligible to receive all other services funded under the Alzheimer’s disease Initiative that are included in the provider’s contract with the department or the area agency on aging, an individual must be 18 years of age or older and have a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease or related memory disorder, or be suspected of having Alzheimer’s disease or a related memory disorder.

(3) The caregivers of individuals receiving services under the Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative are eligible to receive training and related support services to assist them in caring for the person with ADRD.

Specific Authority 430.08 FS. Law Implemented 430.501-.502 FS. History–New 3-28-95, Amended 9-24-08.



58D-1.004 Program Components.

(1) In its role as advisor to the department, the Alzheimer’s Disease Advisory Committee shall provide feedback for each of the following components:

(a) Memory Disorder Clinics;

(b) Brain Bank;

(c) Model Day Care; and

(d) Respite Care.

(2) The Alzheimer’s Disease Advisory Committee shall address service, training, research, and coordination among components.

(3) The Alzheimer’s Disease Advisory Committee may enlist services, assistance, and direction from a broad representation of health care professionals, service providers, individuals affiliated with the Alzheimer’s Association and the provision of Alzheimer’s community care, dementia specific service providers, caregivers, and other interested or knowledgeable parties.

Specific Authority 430.08 FS. Law Implemented 430.501-.502 FS. History–New 3-28-95, Amended 9-24-08.



58D-1.005 Program Administration.

(1) The Department of Elder Affairs shall plan, develop and coordinate a statewide program to carry out its responsibilities under the Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative.

(2) The area agency on aging, under contract with the department, shall be responsible for the planning and administration of respite and model day care services funded under the Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative and shall contract with local service providers for the provision of these services. Each area agency on aging shall:

(a) Comply with State of Florida procedures regarding solicitation and execution of agreements with providers of services.

(b) Maintain coordination with the memory disorder clinics, the Alzheimer’s Disease Brain Bank, and all other components of the Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative in the designated planning and service area as outlined in its contract with the department.

(c) Comply with all terms and conditions of its contract with the department.

Specific Authority 430.08 FS. Law Implemented 430.502-.503 FS. History–New 3-28-95, Amended 10-30-05, 9-24-08.



58D-1.006 Service Provider Responsibilities.

Each service provider must:

(1) Establish service priorities and coordinate the delivery of services to clients.

(2) Employ competent and qualified staff to provide the services essential to the achievement of program goals and objectives as specified in its contract with the department or the area agency on aging.

(3) Maintain the minimum staffing requirements established in its contract with the department or area agency on aging.

(4) Provide case management services as applicable and as specified in its contract with the department or area agency on aging.

(5) Provide respite or model day care services, and maintain coordination with the memory disorder clinics and the brain bank as specified in its contract with the department or area agency on aging.

(6) Provide pre-service and in-service training for staff and volunteers as specified in its contract with the department or area agency on aging.

(7) Monitor subcontract providers to assure quality of service delivery.

(8) Make payments to subcontractors.

(9) Collect co-payments for services pursuant to Section 430.503(2), F.S. Co-payments must be determined pursuant to Rule 58C-1.007, F.A.C.

(10) Maximize the use of volunteers in service delivery.

(11) Develop and implement procedures for client appeals.

(12) Ensure that quality services are delivered to clients and caregivers.

(13) Maintain client and program records and provide reports as required by its contract with the department or area agency on aging.

(14) Establish goals and objectives for the Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative research component and submit reports as specified by the department on research activities.

Specific Authority 430.08 FS. Law Implemented 430.502-.503 FS. History– New 3-28-95, Amended 9-24-08.


58D-1.007 Program Forms.

The forms used for programs regulated by this chapter are incorporated by reference in Rule 58A-1.010, F.A.C. In addition, a care plan must be developed that meets the criteria established in subsection (3) of that rule.

Specific Authority 430.08 FS. Law Implemented 430.502 FS. History–New 8-20-00, Amended 8-6-01, 9-24-08.




Brian Gauthier's A Family Member HomeCare, a Hollywood and Boca Raton caregiver agency serving Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach County, providing Home Health, Home Health Care, Home Health Care Agency, Homecare, In-Home Caregiver, Home Nursing Care, Skilled Nursing, Certified Nursing Assistant, Home Health Aides, Home Health Aide, Senior Companion, Hollywood Home Health Care, Ft. Lauderdale Home Health Care, Miramar Home Health Care, Pembroke Pines Home Health Care, Hallandale Beach Home Health Care, Dania Beach Home Health Care, Cooper City Home Health Care, Fort Lauderdale Home Health Care Agency, Plantation Home Health Care, Weston Home Health Care, Bonaventure Home Health Care, Galt Ocean Mile Home Health Care, Imperial Point Home Health Care, Sunrise Home Health Care, Margate Home Health Care, Lauderhill Home Health Care, Lauderdale Lakes Home Health Care, Medicare Home Health Care, Medicare Home Health Care Agency, Dementia Care Services, Alzheimer's Home Health Care, Coconut Creek Home Health Care, West Park Home Health Care, Coral Springs Home Health Care, Parkland Home Health Care, Deerfield Beach Home Health Care, Pompano Beach Home Health Care, Hillsboro Beach Home Health Care, Lighthouse Point Home Health Care,King's Point Home Health Care, John Knox Village Home Health Care, Palm Aire Home Health Care, Lauderdale by the Sea Home Health Care, Oakland Park Home Health Care, Southwest Ranches Home Health Care, Sea Ranch Lakes Home Health Care, Aventura Home Health Care, Sunny Isles Beach Home Health Care, Surfside Home Health Care, Bahia Mar Home Health Care, Boca Raton, Delray Beach Home Health, Broward Alzheimer's Care, Ft. Lauderdale Dementia Care,

A Family Member HomeCare, A Hollywood and Boca Raton Florida Cautions that Ft. Lauderdale Seniors With Dementia Diagnosis Should Note Alzheimer’s diagnostic guidelines updated for first time in decades





Alzheimer’s diagnostic guidelines updated for first time in decades


For more information: http://www.nia.nih.gov/Alzheimers/Resources/diagnosticguidelines.htm


NIH-supported revision also proposes staging of disease, potential use of biomarkers


The National Institutes of Health announced in April 2011 that, for the first time in 27 years, clinical diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease dementia have been revised, and research guidelines for earlier stages of the disease have been characterized to reflect a deeper understanding of the disorder. The National Institute on Aging/Alzheimer’s Association Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease outline some new approaches for clinicians and provide scientists with more advanced guidelines for moving forward with research on diagnosis and treatments. They mark a major change in how experts think about and study Alzheimer’s disease. Development of the new guidelines was led by the National Institutes of Health and the Alzheimer’s Association.


The original criteria were the first to address the disease and described only later stages, when symptoms of dementia are already evident. The updated guidelines announced today cover the full spectrum of the disease as it gradually changes over many years. They describe the earliest preclinical stages of the disease, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia due to Alzheimer’s pathology. Importantly, the guidelines now address the use of imaging and biomarkers in blood and spinal fluid that may help determine whether changes in the brain and those in body fluids are due to Alzheimer’s disease. Biomarkers are increasingly employed in the research setting to detect onset of the disease and to track progression, but cannot yet be used routinely in clinical diagnosis without further testing and validation.


“Alzheimer’s research has greatly evolved over the past quarter of a century. Bringing the diagnostic guidelines up to speed with those advances is both a necessary and rewarding effort that will benefit patients and accelerate the pace of research,” said National Institute on Aging Director Richard J. Hodes, M.D.


“We believe that the publication of these articles is a major milestone for the field,” said William Thies, Ph.D., chief medical and scientific officer at the Alzheimer’s Association. “Our vision is that this process will result in improved diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer’s, and will drive research that ultimately will enable us to detect and treat the disease earlier and more effectively. This would allow more people to live full, rich lives without—or with a minimum of—Alzheimer’s symptoms.”


The new guidelines appear online April 19, 2011 in Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association. They were developed by expert panels convened last year by the National Institute on Aging (NIA), part of the NIH, and the Alzheimer’s Association. Preliminary recommendations were announced at the Association’s International Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease in July 2010, followed by a comment period.


Guy M. McKhann, M.D., Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, and David S. Knopman, M.D., Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., co-chaired the panel that revised the 1984 clinical Alzheimer’s dementia criteria. Marilyn Albert, Ph.D., Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, headed the panel refining the MCI criteria. Reisa A. Sperling, M.D., Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, led the panel tasked with defining the preclinical stage. The journal also includes a paper by Clifford Jack, M.D., Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., as senior author, on the need for and concept behind the new guidelines.


The original 1984 clinical criteria for Alzheimer’s disease, reflecting the limited knowledge of the day, defined Alzheimer’s as having a single stage, dementia, and based diagnosis solely on clinical symptoms. It assumed that people free of dementia symptoms were disease-free. Diagnosis was confirmed only at autopsy, when the hallmarks of the disease, abnormal amounts of amyloid proteins forming plaques and tau proteins forming tangles, were found in the brain.


Since then, research has determined that Alzheimer’s may cause changes in the brain a decade or more before symptoms appear and that symptoms do not always directly relate to abnormal changes in the brain caused by Alzheimer’s. For example, some older people are found to have abnormal levels of amyloid plaques in the brain at autopsy yet never showed signs of dementia during life. It also appears that amyloid deposits begin early in the disease process but that tangle formation and loss of neurons occur later and may accelerate just before clinical symptoms appear.


To reflect what has been learned, the National Institute on Aging/Alzheimer’s Association Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease cover three distinct stages of Alzheimer’s disease:


Preclinical – The preclinical stage, for which the guidelines only apply in a research setting, describes a phase in which brain changes, including amyloid buildup and other early nerve cell changes, may already be in process. At this point, significant clinical symptoms are not yet evident. In some people, amyloid buildup can be detected with positron emission tomography (PET) scans and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, but it is unknown what the risk for progression to Alzheimer’s dementia is for these individuals. However, use of these imaging and biomarker tests at this stage are recommended only for research. These biomarkers are still being developed and standardized and are not ready for use by clinicians in general practice.
•Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) – The guidelines for the MCI stage are also largely for research, although they clarify existing guidelines for MCI for use in a clinical setting. The MCI stage is marked by symptoms of memory problems, enough to be noticed and measured, but not compromising a person’s independence. People with MCI may or may not progress to Alzheimer’s dementia. Researchers will particularly focus on standardizing biomarkers for amyloid and for other possible signs of injury to the brain. Currently, biomarkers include elevated levels of tau or decreased levels of beta-amyloid in the CSF, reduced glucose uptake in the brain as determined by PET, and atrophy of certain areas of the brain as seen with structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These tests will be used primarily by researchers, but may be applied in specialized clinical settings to supplement standard clinical tests to help determine possible causes of MCI symptoms.
•Alzheimer’s Dementia – These criteria apply to the final stage of the disease, and are most relevant for doctors and patients. They outline ways clinicians should approach evaluating causes and progression of cognitive decline. The guidelines also expand the concept of Alzheimer’s dementia beyond memory loss as its most central characteristic. A decline in other aspects of cognition, such as word-finding, vision/spatial issues, and impaired reasoning or judgment may be the first symptom to be noticed. At this stage, biomarker test results may be used in some cases to increase or decrease the level of certainty about a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s dementia and to distinguish Alzheimer’s dementia from other dementias, even as the validity of such tests is still under study for application and value in everyday clinical practice.


The panels purposefully left the guidelines flexible to allow for changes that could come from emerging technologies and advances in understanding of biomarkers and the disease process itself.


“The guidelines discuss biomarkers currently known, and mention others that may have future applications,” said Creighton H. Phelps, Ph.D., of the NIA Alzheimer’s Disease Centers Program. “With researchers worldwide striving to develop, validate and standardize the application of biomarkers at every stage of Alzheimer’s disease, we devised a framework flexible enough to incorporate new findings.”


###


The Alzheimer's Association is the world’s leading voluntary health organization in Alzheimer’s care, support and research. Their mission is to eliminate Alzheimer’s disease through the advancement of research; to provide and enhance care and support for all affected; and to reduce the risk of dementia through the promotion of brain health. For more information on the Association, visit http://www.alz.org/.


For more information on the new diagnostic criteria and links to the papers referenced below, visit www.alz.org/research/diagnostic_criteria. Media contact is Niles Frantz at 312-335-5777 or niles.frantz@alz.org.


The National Institute on Aging leads the federal government effort conducting and supporting research on aging and the health and well being of older people. The NIA provides information on age-related cognitive change and neurodegenerative disease specifically at its Alzheimer’s Disease Education and Referral (ADEAR) Center at www.nia.nih.gov/Alzheimers For more on health and on aging generally, go to http://www.nia.nih.gov/. To sign up for e-mail alerts about new findings or publications, please visit either website.


About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit http://www.nih.gov/.


References:

•Clifford R. Jack Jr., et al. “Introduction to Revised Criteria for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease: National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups.”
•Guy M. McKhann and David S. Knopman, et al. “The Diagnosis of Dementia due to Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association Workgroup.”
•Marilyn S. Albert, et al. “The Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association Workgroup.”
•Reisa A. Sperling, et al. “Toward Defining the Preclinical Stages of Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association Workgroup.”



More information is below:
Journal articles about the updated guidelines, published in Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association:


A Family Member HomeCare of Hollywood & Boca Raton, Florida is a Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach County Home Health Care Agency Serving Coconut Creek, Cooper City, Coral Springs, Dania, Davie, Deerfield, Ft. Lauderdale, Hallandale, Hillsboro, Hollywood, Lauderdale Lakes, Lauderdale-by-the-Sea, Lauderhill, Lighthouse Point, Margate, Miramar, North Lauderdale, Oakland Park, Parkland, Pembroke Park, Pembroke Pines, Plantation, Pompano, Sea Ranch Lakes, Southwest Ranches, Sunrise, Tamarac, Weston, Wilton Manors, Aventura, Hialeah, North Miami, Miami Lakes, Sunny Isles, Bal Harbour, Surfside, Boynton, Lake Worth & Delray With Comprehensive Home Health Care, In-Home Caregivers, Nursing & Home Health Aides for Seniors, Elderly, Disabled, Dementia & Alzheimer’s Patients. Joint Commission Accredited, Licensed, Bonded, Insured